Active Litigation Tracker

Ozempic and GLP-1 lawsuits: 4,025 injury cases are pending in federal court

As of October 1, 2026, 4,025 lawsuits claiming that Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro and other GLP-1 drugs caused stomach and bowel injuries were pending in one federal case group (MDL 3094) in Philadelphia.

  • 247 more claim sudden vision loss (NAION) in a second group, MDL 3163, before the same judge.
  • These are allegations. No court has found Novo Nordisk or Eli Lilly liable, and both deny the stomach-injury claims.
  • Separately, the FTC is suing Hims & Hers over billing and cancellation, and the makers are suing compounders.

Counts come from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's pending-MDL report dated October 1, 2026.

Last updated: October 17, 2026. This is a summary of publicly reported litigation, not legal advice.

Active Cases We're Tracking in 2026

Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro stomach-injury claims (MDL 3094)

MDL Active
Defendant
Novo Nordisk (Ozempic, Wegovy, Rybelsus) and Eli Lilly (Mounjaro, Trulicity)
Scale
4,025 actions pending; 4,139 filed in total
Court
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania (MDL No. 3094), Judge Karen S. Marston

The plaintiffs allege that these GLP-1 drugs caused gastroparesis and other gastrointestinal injuries, and that the makers failed to warn about them.

Both defendant groups deny the allegations. The JPML counted 4,025 pending actions as of October 1, 2026.

The court held a Rule 702 (Daubert) hearing on expert evidence from September 14 to 18, 2026. No court has found the makers liable.

Source: Court's MDL 3094 page; counts from the JPML pending-MDL report

Updated: October 2026

Vision-loss (NAION) claims against GLP-1 makers (MDL 3163)

MDL Active
Defendant
Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly
Scale
247 actions pending
Court
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania (MDL No. 3163), Judge Karen S. Marston

The plaintiffs allege that Ozempic, Wegovy, Saxenda and Trulicity caused non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), a sudden loss of vision in one eye.

The JPML centralized the cases in Philadelphia on December 15, 2025, before the same judge as the stomach-injury MDL, and counted 247 pending actions as of October 1, 2026.

These are allegations, not findings.

Source: JPML transfer order, December 15, 2025

Updated: October 2026

Novo Nordisk vs. Compounding Pharmacies (Patent Infringement)

Active across 40+ states
Defendant
130+ compounding pharmacies
Scale
Varies by case
Court
Multiple federal and state courts

Novo Nordisk has filed 130+ lawsuits against compounding pharmacies selling compounded semaglutide, alleging patent infringement and patient safety violations.

Many resulted in settlements or pharmacy closures.

Updated: March 2026

Eli Lilly vs. Compounding Pharmacies (Tirzepatide)

Active
Defendant
Multiple compounding pharmacies
Scale
Varies by case
Court
Multiple federal courts

Eli Lilly is pursuing similar patent enforcement actions against pharmacies compounding tirzepatide (the active ingredient in Mounjaro/Zepbound).

FDA had listed tirzepatide as in shortage since December 2022 and determined that shortage resolved on December 19, 2024, and it was that resolution, not a finding that the shortage never existed, that ended the broad compounding window.

Updated: February 2026

FTC and States v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Pending
Defendant
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (parent of Hims and Hers)
Scale
Unspecified; the complaint seeks civil penalties and a monetary judgment
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California

On July 29, 2026 the Federal Trade Commission, joined by the Utah Division of Consumer Protection and the People of the State of California acting through Los Angeles County Counsel Dawyn R. Harrison, filed a Complaint for Permanent Injunction, Monetary Judgment, Civil Penalty Judgment, and Other Relief against Hims & Hers Health, Inc. The complaint alleges the company fails to clearly disclose that it charges consumers for prescriptions almost immediately after they submit an intake form, despite telling them they will be able to consult a medical provider first; that it made subscriptions difficult to cancel; and that it shared consumers' health information with Meta, Snap and other third parties despite claiming its services keep that information private.

Case status is Pending. These are allegations that have not been proven in court, and the company has not been found liable.

Hims and Hers are the two consumer brands of this defendant, and both of our review pages carry the same disclosure.

Source: FTC Legal Library case record

Updated: August 2026

FTC Enforcement Against Deceptive GLP-1 Marketing

Ongoing investigations
Defendant
Various telehealth companies
Scale
N/A
Court
FTC Administrative Proceedings

The FTC is investigating multiple telehealth companies for deceptive marketing practices related to GLP-1 medications, including false efficacy claims, hidden pricing, and misleading before/after imagery.

Updated: January 2026

State AG Actions Against Compounded GLP-1 Sellers

Active in 12+ states
Defendant
Various compounding pharmacies and telehealth providers
Scale
Varies by state
Court
State courts and AG offices

State attorneys general in Texas, California, Florida, and 9+ other states are pursuing enforcement against companies selling compounded GLP-1 medications without proper licensing or making unsubstantiated health claims.

Updated: March 2026

What This Means for Patients

If you experienced severe GI side effects

If you developed gastroparesis, severe stomach paralysis, bowel obstruction, or other serious GI injuries while taking Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, or Zepbound, you may be eligible to join the MDL.

Consult a personal injury attorney specializing in pharmaceutical litigation.

If your compounded medication was discontinued

Many compounding pharmacies shut down or stopped offering semaglutide after FDA enforcement and Novo Nordisk lawsuits.

If your provider can no longer supply your medication, see our provider rankings for legitimate alternatives offering brand-name or reformulated compounded options.

How to verify your provider

Use our Safety Checker to review the public warning-letter and pharmacy-disclosure records we have collected.

It is a non-exhaustive research aid, not proof of FDA compliance or medical safety.

Where to go next

Not sure which provider is safe and right for you? Take our 2-minute match quiz, or explore the safety resources below.

Legal disclaimer: This page provides general information about publicly reported litigation. It is not legal advice. If you believe you have a claim, consult a qualified attorney. Case outcomes, amounts and statuses change. We date each case card and take case counts from the JPML's published reports.